Security guards John Laing Construction Ltd v Amber Pass Ltd [2004] 17 EG 128 (Deputy High Court Judge). T operated a break clause in the lease and went out of occupation. However, T retained security guards and protective barriers at the premises for security purposes. L argued that T had failed to yield up the premises and so argued that the break clause had not been effectively terminated. The argument was rejected. Looking at the matter objectively T had done…
You must be logged in to view this content.
This content is available on our subscription plans - join today for full access to the legal library
English 