Property Law Library
Boundaries and adverse possession
Deeds, plans and boundary features
Presumptions
Boundary agreements
Adverse possession
Adverse possession and Pye v Graham
Land Registration Act 2002
Consent
Acknowledgement of title
Estoppel
Highways
Human rights
Miscellaneous
Multiple parcels
Criminal offence
Experts
Party walls
Tidal waters
T-marks
Trees and hedges
Business lease renewal
Telecommunications Code
Does the Act apply?
Contracting out
Surrender
Section 25 notices
Counternotice
Section 26 requests
Ground (b)
Ground (c)
Ground (f)
Ground (g)
Rent
New lease terms
Easements on renewal
Compensation
Procedure
Insolvency of landlord
Registration of claim
Reform of Part II
Commonhold
Co-ownership and estoppel
Co-ownership disputes - Stack v Dowden
Partnership
Equitable accounting
Pallant v Morgan
Proprietary estoppel
Yeomans Row v Cobbe
Yeomans and s2 of 1989 Act
Assurance and reliance - Thorner
Laches and estoppel
Satisfying the equity
Tax
Trusts of Land etc Act 1996
Easements
Abandonment
Commons and rights of way
Construing rights of way
Extinguisment
Gardens
Extent of grant
Illegality
Implied and s62
Increasing the burden
Parking
Prescription
Profits a prendre
Repair to right of way
Registration of easements
Right to light
Excluding the right
Injunction?
Damages
Substantial interference
Landlord and tenant (general)
Assignment
Break clauses
Notices
Material compliance and breaches
Miscellaneous
Repayment of rent
Yielding up
Chattels and fixtures
Business rates
Consents
Tenant's request
Landlord's response
Reasonable refusal
Conditions
Alterations
Underletting
Construction of lease terms
Dilapidations
Breach
Landlord's obligation
Schedules and notices
Standard of repair
Damages and s18 cap
Miscellaneous
Discrimination
Disclaimer
Distress
Estoppel
Forfeiture
Rent claims
Other cases
Section 146 notices
Waiver
Registration gap
Court procedure
Relief
Unlawful forfeiture
Law reform
Goods left on the premises
Indemnity
Insolvency
L & T (Covenants) Act 1995
Licences
Management regulations
Merger
Nuisance
Notices - service
Pre-emption clause
Rent
Rent review
Construction
Presumption of reality
Time of essence
Rent review notices
Arbitration
Rent suspension
Restraint of trade
Service charges and insurance (general)
Set-off
Subletting, sharing possession or occupation
Surrender by operation of law
Surrender and re-grant
Tenancy at will
Uncertain term
Unlawful eviction
Long leases
Acquisition orders
Enfranchisement
House?
Forms
Qualifications
Notices
Miscellaneous
Enfranchisement proceedings
Terms of the transfer
Valuation (deferment rates and hope value)
Valuation (other points)
Forfeiture restrictions
Ground rent notices
Management
Right to manage
Manager under 1987 Act
Part 1 of the 1954 Act
Right of first refusal
Developers beware
Service and administration charges and insurance
Construction of the lease
Statutory control - reasonableness
Service charge demands
Administration charges
Summary of leaseholder's rights
Insurance
Managing agents
Reserve funds
The 18-month rule
Consultation of tenants
Compromise of service charge dispute
Legal costs
Transfer to First-tier Tribunal
Variation of lease terms
Mobile homes and caravans
Mortgages
Negligent valuation
Bank all monies charge
Charging orders
Civil Recovery Order
Consumer Credit Act 1974
Consumer Credit Act 2006
Clog on the equity of redemeption
Facility agreement
Forgery
Interest
Limitation and shortfall
Marshalling
Misrepresentation and affirmation
Money claim
Mortgage indemnity policies
Enforcement
Mortgage possession
Costs
Mortgage arrears protocol
Time to sell
Miscellaneous
Enforcement
Negligent financial advice
Priorities
Proving the loan
Regulation
Sale
Effect of sale on possession
Duties on sale
Orders for sale
Sale and leaseback
Solicitor's breach of trust and negligence
Subrogation
Terms
Tenants of mortgagees
Undue influence
Unfair contract terms
Nuisance and trespass
Abating the nuisance
Damages - account of profits
Damages - human rights
Defects in neighbouring property
Defences
Fire
Noise
Self-help
Trees
Trespass
Water
Planning
Appeals procedure
Change of use
Children
Compensation
Compulsory purchase
Conditions
Development
Definition
Development plans
Design and access statements
General permitted development
Lawful development certificates
Environmental
Enforcement
Enforcement notices
Deceit
Deemed permission
Estoppel
User for 4 or 10 years
Stop notices
Judicial review
Localism
Material considerations
Permission
Policy consultation
National policy
Property litigation and ADR
Automatic stay
Business leases
Compromise
Costs
Damages in lieu of injunction
Declaration
Expert evidence
Harassment by proceedings
Property Chamber
Land Registry Adjudicator
Residential Property Tribunal
Mediation
Party wall awards
Tomlin orders
Unilateral notices
Property transactions
Commercial lease code
Contaminated land
Contract
Deeds
Defective Premises Act
Deposits
Electronic Communications Code
EPCs in Commercial Properties
Execution
Failure to complete
Gifts of land
Guarantees and indemnities
Land registration
Local government
Misrepresentation and answers to enquiries
Money laundering
Notice to complete
Options
Overage
Planning obligations
Perpetuities
Positive covenants
Rectification
Rent charges
Searches and enquiries
Solicitors
Title
Undertakings
Unjust enrichment
Vendor's lien
Writing - s2 of 1989 Act
Possession claims
Protection from Eviction Act
Trespassers
Bankruptcy
Disability discrimination defences
Human Rights Act defences
Weaver
Procedure
Orders for possession
Costs
Warrants
Suspending warrants
Setting aside
Public access to land
Commons
Right to roam
Town and village greens
The main cases
Cancellation of registration
Inhabitants of locality
User as of right
Residential tenancies
Anti-social behaviour
Asbo or injunction
Family Intervention Tenancies
Injunctions under 1996 Act
Possession orders
Committal
Assured tenancies
Assured shortholds
Section 20 Notices
Section 21 Notices
Boats
Housing disrepair claims
Liability
Damages for disrepair
Costs in disrepair cases
Homeless persons
Human rights
Introductory tenancies
Licences - Bruton Tenancies
Neighbouring Noises
Notice to quit
Proceeds of crime
Reform
Rent Act 1977
Rent books
Right to buy
Secure tenancies
Tenancy deposit
Tenant's notice to quit
Tolerated trespassers
Unfair contract terms
Unlawful eviction
Restrictive covenants
Benefit of covenants
Burden
Competition
Consent to development
Enforcing covenants
Interpretation - breach
Modification and discharge
Overage
Variation under s610 of 1985 Act
Monthly Update
Boundaries and adverse possession.
Business lease renewal.
Co-ownership and estoppel.
Easements.
Landlord and tenant (general).
Long leases.
Mobile homes.
Mortgages.
Nuisance and trespass.
Planning.
Property litigation and ADR.
Property transactions.
Public access to land.
Residential tenancies.
Restrictive covenants.
Free summaries
Property Mediation
Property Mediators
Alan Langleben
Beverly-Ann Rogers
David Blackburn
David Small
Gary Webber
Jacky Lewis
Jacqui Joyce
Jeremy Manuel
Jonathan Arkush
John de Waal
Louisa Weinstein
Marc Beaumont
Mark Hacking
Mark Summerfield
Martin Banham-Hall
Martyn Liberson
Paul Randolph
Paul Newman
Sara Benbow
Simon Williams
Stephen Shaw
Stephanie Tozer
Timothy Russ
Tactics and strategy at mediation
Training
Conferences and courses
In-house courses
Co-ownership
Drafting
Covenants
Dilapidation claims
Easements
Housing disrepair.
Insolvency
Managing Leases
Misrepresentation and answers to enquiries
Mixed Use Properties
Mortgages
Overage
Remedies in property disputes
Residential leases
Restrictive covenants
Sale Contracts
Section 2 of the 1989 Act
Twenty Topical Traps
Unreasonable refusal to consent
Information
Contact
Barristers
Solicitors
Experts
Books
Boundaries and party walls.
Commonhold.
Commercial leases.
Commons and village greens.
Conveyancing and property development.
Disrepair.
Easements.
Environment.
Farms
Housing
Long leases.
Mediation.
Mortgage.
Nuisance.
Residential tenancies.
Restrictive covenants.
Service charges.
SDLT and VAT
Links
Cases and articles
Civil procedure
Contaminated land
Housing forms
Land Registration
Law reform
Neighbour and boundary disputes
Organisations
Professional associations
Publishers on-line
Residential landlord and tenant
Scotland
Statutes and SI's
Join HERE
Members Login
Download update
My Details
My Invoices
My Subscriptions
My CPD
Instructions
Logout
Home Page
>
Property Law Library
>
Property transactions
>
Solicitors
Home Page
Contact
Editorial Team
Section Contents
Commercial lease code
Contaminated land
Contract
Deeds
Defective Premises Act
Deposits
Electronic Communications Code
EPCs in Commercial Properties
Execution
Failure to complete
Gifts of land
Guarantees and indemnities
Land registration
Local government
Misrepresentation and answers to enquiries
Money laundering
Notice to complete
Options
Overage
Planning obligations
Perpetuities
Positive covenants
Rectification
Rent charges
Searches and enquiries
Solicitors
Title
Undertakings
Unjust enrichment
Vendor's lien
Writing - s2 of 1989 Act
Print Version
Current page
Solicitors
Dont act for both parties!
A solicitor acted for both parties in a property transaction in breach of r6 of the Solicitor's Practice Rules 1990 which states that the same firm cannot act for both sides "if a conflict of interest exists or arises" or if the seller is selling or leasing as a builder or developer, which he was doing in this case. The seller did not know that the purchaser had criminal convictions. The solicitor did. What is more the solicitors were providing monies to the purchaser to help with the deposit. The solicitor was under two irreconcilable duties: (i) to the seller to disclose that fact and (ii) to the buyer not to disclose that information. To disclose discreditable facts about a client, and to do so without the client's informed consent, is likely to be a breach of duty, even if the facts are in the public domain to keep the information confidential. (Lord Walker, para 34). The transactions of course went badly wrong and the seller suffered bad losses.
Held
: The solicitors were liable for the loss (at para 8). Lord Scott:
So the conclusion seems to me inescapable that the solicitors had put themselves in a position in which they owed to their two clients, Mr Bromage on the one hand and the appellant on the other hand, contractual duties that were inconsistent with one another. If, at an early stage, they had told the appellant that they could not act for him and that he should go to other solicitors, they would have extricated themselves from their dilemma. In the event, however, they continued to act for both clients and it was inevitable that they would be in breach of the contractual duties they owed to one or the other. The unfortunate victim turned out to be the appellant and they have no answer, in my opinion, to his claim against them for damages for breach of contract.
Lord Walker drew a parallel with another situation (para 35):
If a house owner contracts to sell his house to one purchaser for 240,000 and then a week later contracts to sell it to another purchaser for 250,000, he assumes two contractual duties which are on the face of it irreconcilable, unless the seller has grounds for rescinding either contract, or can persuade one or other purchaser to release him from his obligation. That is so whether he enters into the second contract with his eyes open, in the hopes of making a larger profit, or whether (rather improbably) he does so inadvertently. It is no answer for him to say to either purchaser: I am sorry, I am obligated to another. His dilemma is his own fault (the phrase used by Lord Cozens-Hardy MR in
Moody v Cox
[1917] 2 Ch 71, 81 ..).
And went on (para 44):
Mr Gibson submitted that a solicitor who has conflicting duties to two clients may not prefer one to another. That is, I think, correct as a general rule, and it distinguishes the case of two irreconcilable duties from a conflict of duty and personal interest (where the solicitor is bound to prefer his duty to his own interest). Since he may not prefer one duty to another, he must perform both as best he can. This may involve performing one duty to the letter of the obligation, and paying compensation for his failure to perform the other. But in any case the fact that he has chosen to put himself in an impossible position does not exonerate him from liability.
Hilton v Barker Booth and Eastwood
[2005] UKHL 8
Article
: Conflicts of interest by Ian Wood, barrister A fuller explanation of the case (
Solicitors Journal
4 March 2005, p250).
Solicitors' Practice Rules 1990
The Law Society has made changes to rules 6(3) and 6A, which deal with conflicts of interest, relating to the situation where a solicitor acts for both the lender and the borrower. The change was announced in the
Law Gazette
. They do not arise out of the above case but arise out of the introduction of Commonhold. In force 9 February 2005.
Back to top
If you have found this page useful, you may be interested in the following:
Options
Free Summaries
£nil
Full Membership
From £207 + VAT (1 year)