Property Law Library
Boundaries and adverse possession
Deeds, plans and boundary features
Presumptions
Boundary agreements
Adverse possession
Adverse possession and Pye v Graham
Land Registration Act 2002
Consent
Acknowledgement of title
Estoppel
Highways
Human rights
Miscellaneous
Multiple parcels
Criminal offence
Experts
Party walls
Tidal waters
T-marks
Trees and hedges
Business lease renewal
Telecommunications Code
Does the Act apply?
Contracting out
Surrender
Section 25 notices
Counternotice
Section 26 requests
Ground (b)
Ground (c)
Ground (f)
Ground (g)
Rent
New lease terms
Easements on renewal
Compensation
Procedure
Insolvency of landlord
Registration of claim
Reform of Part II
Commonhold
Co-ownership and estoppel
Co-ownership disputes - Stack v Dowden
Partnership
Equitable accounting
Pallant v Morgan
Proprietary estoppel
Yeomans Row v Cobbe
Yeomans and s2 of 1989 Act
Assurance and reliance - Thorner
Laches and estoppel
Satisfying the equity
Tax
Trusts of Land etc Act 1996
Easements
Abandonment
Commons and rights of way
Construing rights of way
Extinguisment
Gardens
Extent of grant
Illegality
Implied and s62
Increasing the burden
Parking
Prescription
Profits a prendre
Repair to right of way
Registration of easements
Right to light
Excluding the right
Injunction?
Damages
Substantial interference
Landlord and tenant (general)
Assignment
Break clauses
Notices
Material compliance and breaches
Miscellaneous
Repayment of rent
Yielding up
Chattels and fixtures
Business rates
Consents
Tenant's request
Landlord's response
Reasonable refusal
Conditions
Alterations
Underletting
Construction of lease terms
Dilapidations
Breach
Landlord's obligation
Schedules and notices
Standard of repair
Damages and s18 cap
Miscellaneous
Discrimination
Disclaimer
Distress
Estoppel
Forfeiture
Rent claims
Other cases
Section 146 notices
Waiver
Registration gap
Court procedure
Relief
Unlawful forfeiture
Law reform
Goods left on the premises
Indemnity
Insolvency
L & T (Covenants) Act 1995
Licences
Management regulations
Merger
Nuisance
Notices - service
Pre-emption clause
Rent
Rent review
Construction
Presumption of reality
Time of essence
Rent review notices
Arbitration
Rent suspension
Restraint of trade
Service charges and insurance (general)
Set-off
Subletting, sharing possession or occupation
Surrender by operation of law
Surrender and re-grant
Tenancy at will
Uncertain term
Unlawful eviction
Long leases
Acquisition orders
Enfranchisement
House?
Forms
Qualifications
Notices
Miscellaneous
Enfranchisement proceedings
Terms of the transfer
Valuation (deferment rates and hope value)
Valuation (other points)
Forfeiture restrictions
Ground rent notices
Management
Right to manage
Manager under 1987 Act
Part 1 of the 1954 Act
Right of first refusal
Developers beware
Service and administration charges and insurance
Construction of the lease
Statutory control - reasonableness
Service charge demands
Administration charges
Summary of leaseholder's rights
Insurance
Managing agents
Reserve funds
The 18-month rule
Consultation of tenants
Compromise of service charge dispute
Legal costs
Transfer to First-tier Tribunal
Variation of lease terms
Mobile homes and caravans
Mortgages
Negligent valuation
Bank all monies charge
Charging orders
Civil Recovery Order
Consumer Credit Act 1974
Consumer Credit Act 2006
Clog on the equity of redemeption
Facility agreement
Forgery
Interest
Limitation and shortfall
Marshalling
Misrepresentation and affirmation
Money claim
Mortgage indemnity policies
Enforcement
Mortgage possession
Costs
Mortgage arrears protocol
Time to sell
Miscellaneous
Enforcement
Negligent financial advice
Priorities
Proving the loan
Regulation
Sale
Effect of sale on possession
Duties on sale
Orders for sale
Sale and leaseback
Solicitor's breach of trust and negligence
Subrogation
Terms
Tenants of mortgagees
Undue influence
Unfair contract terms
Nuisance and trespass
Abating the nuisance
Damages - account of profits
Damages - human rights
Defects in neighbouring property
Defences
Fire
Noise
Self-help
Trees
Trespass
Water
Planning
Appeals procedure
Change of use
Children
Compensation
Compulsory purchase
Conditions
Development
Definition
Development plans
Design and access statements
General permitted development
Lawful development certificates
Environmental
Enforcement
Enforcement notices
Deceit
Deemed permission
Estoppel
User for 4 or 10 years
Stop notices
Judicial review
Localism
Material considerations
Permission
Policy consultation
National policy
Property litigation and ADR
Automatic stay
Business leases
Compromise
Costs
Damages in lieu of injunction
Declaration
Expert evidence
Harassment by proceedings
Property Chamber
Land Registry Adjudicator
Residential Property Tribunal
Mediation
Party wall awards
Tomlin orders
Unilateral notices
Property transactions
Commercial lease code
Contaminated land
Contract
Deeds
Defective Premises Act
Deposits
Electronic Communications Code
EPCs in Commercial Properties
Execution
Failure to complete
Gifts of land
Guarantees and indemnities
Land registration
Local government
Misrepresentation and answers to enquiries
Money laundering
Notice to complete
Options
Overage
Planning obligations
Perpetuities
Positive covenants
Rectification
Rent charges
Searches and enquiries
Solicitors
Title
Undertakings
Unjust enrichment
Vendor's lien
Writing - s2 of 1989 Act
Possession claims
Protection from Eviction Act
Trespassers
Bankruptcy
Disability discrimination defences
Human Rights Act defences
Weaver
Procedure
Orders for possession
Costs
Warrants
Suspending warrants
Setting aside
Public access to land
Commons
Right to roam
Town and village greens
The main cases
Cancellation of registration
Inhabitants of locality
User as of right
Residential tenancies
Anti-social behaviour
Asbo or injunction
Family Intervention Tenancies
Injunctions under 1996 Act
Possession orders
Committal
Assured tenancies
Assured shortholds
Section 20 Notices
Section 21 Notices
Boats
Housing disrepair claims
Liability
Damages for disrepair
Costs in disrepair cases
Homeless persons
Human rights
Introductory tenancies
Licences - Bruton Tenancies
Neighbouring Noises
Notice to quit
Proceeds of crime
Reform
Rent Act 1977
Rent books
Right to buy
Secure tenancies
Tenancy deposit
Tenant's notice to quit
Tolerated trespassers
Unfair contract terms
Unlawful eviction
Restrictive covenants
Benefit of covenants
Burden
Competition
Consent to development
Enforcing covenants
Interpretation - breach
Modification and discharge
Overage
Variation under s610 of 1985 Act
Monthly Update
Boundaries and adverse possession.
Business lease renewal.
Co-ownership and estoppel.
Easements.
Landlord and tenant (general).
Long leases.
Mobile homes.
Mortgages.
Nuisance and trespass.
Planning.
Property litigation and ADR.
Property transactions.
Public access to land.
Residential tenancies.
Restrictive covenants.
Free summaries
Property Mediation
Property Mediators
Alan Langleben
Beverly-Ann Rogers
David Blackburn
David Small
Gary Webber
Jacky Lewis
Jacqui Joyce
Jeremy Manuel
Jonathan Arkush
John de Waal
Louisa Weinstein
Marc Beaumont
Mark Hacking
Mark Summerfield
Martin Banham-Hall
Martyn Liberson
Paul Randolph
Paul Newman
Sara Benbow
Simon Williams
Stephen Shaw
Stephanie Tozer
Timothy Russ
Tactics and strategy at mediation
Training
Conferences and courses
In-house courses
Co-ownership
Drafting
Covenants
Dilapidation claims
Easements
Housing disrepair.
Insolvency
Managing Leases
Misrepresentation and answers to enquiries
Mixed Use Properties
Mortgages
Overage
Remedies in property disputes
Residential leases
Restrictive covenants
Sale Contracts
Section 2 of the 1989 Act
Twenty Topical Traps
Unreasonable refusal to consent
Information
Contact
Barristers
Solicitors
Experts
Books
Boundaries and party walls.
Commonhold.
Commercial leases.
Commons and village greens.
Conveyancing and property development.
Disrepair.
Easements.
Environment.
Farms
Housing
Long leases.
Mediation.
Mortgage.
Nuisance.
Residential tenancies.
Restrictive covenants.
Service charges.
SDLT and VAT
Links
Cases and articles
Civil procedure
Contaminated land
Housing forms
Land Registration
Law reform
Neighbour and boundary disputes
Organisations
Professional associations
Publishers on-line
Residential landlord and tenant
Scotland
Statutes and SI's
Join HERE
Members Login
Download update
My Details
My Invoices
My Subscriptions
My CPD
Instructions
Logout
Home Page
>
Property Law Library
>
Planning
>
Conditions
Home Page
Contact
Editorial Team
Section Contents
Appeals procedure
Change of use
Children
Compensation
Compulsory purchase
Conditions
Development
Environmental
Enforcement
Judicial review
Localism
Material considerations
Permission
Policy consultation
National policy
Print Version
Current page
Conditions
Certainty of conditions
R (On The Application of Orchard (Development) Holdings Plc v First Secretary Of State)
[2005] EWHC 1665 (Admin)
The Claimant challenged the refusal of an appeal by an inspector on the grounds that a Grampian condition proposed by the Claimant for a grant of planning permission for a residential development was too imprecise. The main issue before the inspector was in relation to the provision of a replacement football ground. The Claimant had proposed a condition preventing the commencement of any development until it had provided an alternative football ground that had equivalent or better recreational and community facilities to those available at the existing football stadium.
The Court held that the decision of the planning inspector had been an exercise of planning judgement which it was inappropriate to quash. The Inspector did not have available in the proposed condition sufficient criteria to enable him to compare the proposed football ground with that offered by the existing football ground.
Condition as modification
Redrow Homes Limited v First Secretary of State and another
[2003] EWHC 3094 (Admin)
Facts
Redrow owned part of a larger site that had the benefit of a 1957 outline planning permission for commercial development. The original permission allowed for three access roads linking with public highways, subject to a condition that no access road should be constructed until its precise location had been agreed with the local planning authority.
In 2000 Redrow applied for approval from the local planning authority for a specific access road location. The application was not determined within the two-month time limit and Redrow appealed to the Secretary of State. He granted approval subject to a condition that the access road use of the access road should be restricted to public service vehicles only. Redrow challenged this decision in the High Court under section 278 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 on the ground that the imposition of the condition amounted to a revocation or modification of an extant planning permission.
Decision
Sullivan J allowed the appeal by Redrow, holding that unless the original planning permission had contained words of limitation, it must be assumed that access was intended to the site by the same traffic that used the public highways. The Secretary of State had accordingly acted unlawfully. If he wished to modify the planning permission he had to do so by way of section 100 of the 1990 Act, so allowing Redrow a claim for compensation under section 107.
Comment
It was decided in
R v Newbury District Council, ex parte Stevens and Partridge
[1992] 3 PLR 94 that there is power to grant approval of reserved matters conditionally, but that such power must not be exercised in a way that derogates materially from the original grant of outline planning permission.
Interpretation - new retail development
Northampton Borough Council v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Land Securities Properties Limited
[2005] EWHC 168 (Admin)
The judge held in this case that where a planning permission condition sought to impose an upper limit on non food retail floor space, then the use for retail purposes of additional floor space created by the installation of a mezzanine floor would reasonably be described as "new development" within the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s.55:
"Mr Katkowski submitted that the use of the mezzanine for non-food retail purposes would not be "new retail development" as mentioned in the reason for the imposition of the condition as varied, because section 55(2)(a) expressly excludes such internal works from the definition of development.
26. In my judgment, this is an example of interpreting a condition and the reasons given for the imposition of a condition in a legalistic rather than in a common sense way. It is perfectly true that a lawyer would not describe the carrying out of internal alterations,whether by the installation of a mezzanine or otherwise, as "new development", because of the provisions of section 55(2)(a). However, the use for retail purposes of the additional floor space thereby created would reasonably be described as "new retail development" in the context of a condition that was seeking to impose an upper limit upon non-food retail floor space."
Back to top
If you have found this page useful, you may be interested in the following:
Options
Free Summaries
£nil
Full Membership
From £207 + VAT (1 year)